Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fons Van Sambeek vs Roland Stuurman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sambeek vs Stuurman analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Fons Van Sambeek vs Roland Stuurman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sambeek 0 - 0 Stuurman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sambeek has won 43.96% of points on their second serve, while Stuurman has won 44.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sambeek, in recent form, has won 55.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stuurman has won 53.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.82% and 33.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sambeek has saved 57.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stuurman has saved 45.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sambeek has won 46.15% of matches played (W/L 12/ 14), with Stuurman winning 59.18% (W/L 29/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Stuurman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 52/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11), where as Stuurman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.18% of matches (W/L 29/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sambeek has played against opponents with an average rank of 121.27 while Stuurman has played against players with an average rank of 34.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sambeek has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stuurman has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sambeek has converted 45.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stuurman has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
Form
54% (38-33)
Career Total W/L
52% (101-93)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Fons Van Sambeek vs Roland Stuurman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sambeek VS Stuurman
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fons Van Sambeek | Roland Stuurman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 63% (15/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 55% (31/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (74/65) | 53% (299/263) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (15/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.5 | 30.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (204/295) | 67% (357/534) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (122/204) | 60% (215/357) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (40/91) | 45% (79/177) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (14/31) | 44% (24/54) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (124/302) | 41% (228/552) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 63% (15/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Stian Klaassen
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 3-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Barbier Gazeu
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Perry Gregg
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Nick Lagaev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Capalbo
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Roland Stuurman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tauheed Browning
Player
Roland Stuurman
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Roland Stuurman
Player
Romain Faucon
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
view more
Sambeek Vs Stuurman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sambeek are available here and Stuurman photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Fons Van Sambeek
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
